A ‘Wake-Up Call’: Wool Production Uses 367 Times More Land Than Cotton

In a report aptly named Shear Destruction, the Center for Biological Diversity and Collective Fashion Justice’s “Circumfauna” initiative assesses the sustainability of wool compared to other materials. Researchers identified wool production as a key contributor to biodiversity loss and climate breakdown.

What’s more: It’s beautiful.

Hard facts, nicely packaged

The well-designed publication was put into the trusted hands of mission-aligned branding, content, and venture agency Very Good Looking. In turn, it got decorated creative Ari Liloan on board to breathe life into the facts and figures. The result? Beautifully crafted, double-edged illustration work.

Solid research and drastic finds

But if the design pulls you in, it’s the solid research work and drastic findings that make you stay.

“Nothing about wool is sustainable,” said population and sustainability director at the Center for Biological Diversity, Stephanie Feldstein. She is also co-author of the report.

Feldstein finds clear words: “The industry has been pulling the wool over our eyes for decades, claiming that wool is a sustainable fiber.”

Five times the climate cost of cotton

According to the report, nothing could be further from the truth.

The average climate cost of sheep’s wool, according to the findings, is three times greater than acrylic materials. And, a whopping five times greater than conventionally grown cotton.

Additionally, it uses 367 (!) times more land per bale than cotton. Further, the chemically intensive process of cleaning shorn wool kills aquatic life and pollutes waterways, says Shear Destruction.

“Sheep grazing pastureland may seem innocent and natural,” says Collective Fashion Justice founding director Emma Hakansson, co-author of the report.

“There’s nothing natural about this inefficient, unsustainable and exploitative industry.”

In pursuit of a better fashion future

The report based its findings on available data from the Higg Material Sustainability Index (MSI), the Food Agriculture Organization (FAO), Australian and U.S. government agency reports, industry sources, and scientific papers.

“Cutting through the wool industry’s well-funded mythology is no easy task,” says Joshua Katcher, founder of the Circumfauna initiative and co-author of the report. 

“We need to have an honest discussion about wool’s outsized impact and transition to plant-derived and high-tech materials that don’t take such a big toll on native species and the climate.”

Those behind the paper are calling on the fashion industry – including associations, brands, and designers – to reduce wool use by at least 50 percent by 2025. This is with a view to bolster “material innovation and embrace alternatives that do not depend on fossil fuel-derived fibers.”

 

via plantbasednews.org